~ The FEMALE MULTIPLE ORGASM Forum ~ www.femalemultiple.org
February 19, 2018, 12:08:05 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to the new Female Mutliple Orgasm Forum!

The Female Multiple Orgasm Forum is THE place to find information, ask questions and share your experience about female multiple orgasms and becoming multi-orgasmic.

   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10
 on: January 17, 2012, 10:11:51 AM 
Started by clumsygirl - Last post by clumsygirl
At present, there are a number of research labs that are focused on the creation of cells that are genetically male but have been produced from eggs. Alternately, they are also trying to create sperm from female eggs. If the research proves to work, the consequences are particularly important for gay and lesbian couples that wish to have children. The idea is an extremely controversial one that mixes in with politics, religion and ethics. The experiment was widely reported in the news but has not yet been published or successfully replicated, the work does still show that potential for same-sex reproduction exists, and it will likely spur further research in this area. The reproductive revolution is really already in progress.

Is same-sex reproduction really possible? I think we should figure out the nature of reproduction first. Theoretically, the human reproduction just requires the fusion of two haploid gametes, and then cell development into a baby under certain conditions. I will elaborate the possibility of same-sex reproduction from two different thinking.

1, the thinking of Surrogacy
There are 2 types of surrogate mother: complete surrogacy and partial surrogacy. Partial surrogacy is not true surrogacy, and what I mention here is complete surrogacy.

Complete surrogacy: to use consignor couple’s sperm and eggs, implanting into surrogate mother’s womb then through artificial insemination till the birth of baby. In the whole process, surrogate mother only rents out uterus, no any gene relationship between baby and her.

When we told about reproduction before meiosis was discovered and described for the first time in sea urchin eggs in 1876 by the German biologist Oscar Hertwig, people always linked a man, a woman and sex together. On July 25, 1978, Louise Joy Brown, after the world's first successful "test-tube" baby was born in Great Britain, people realized reproduction doesn’t require a man, a woman and sexual behavior between them , but only need sperm, egg and uterus. In this process, sperm replaced a man, and a woman divided into an egg and uterus (as carrier), and sex can be abandoned. We can follow this line of thought and continue to dig deep. The nature of sperm is human haploid nucleus, and an egg can be divided into a haploid nucleus and a shell with enough nutrients and energy but without any nucleus. In my view, the egg without nucleus is another form of surrogate mother, one is considered from a macro perspective, and the other is from a micro perspective, and both of them share the same nature and just provide a place and nutrients and energy required for the cell development. I think, maybe one day, the shell and uterus both can be replaced by some complete set of reproduction mechanisms, and this reproductive system can total replace all certain conditions for a child. In that time, parents just only need to provide two gamete nuclei of them, and female polar body also can be used as same as egg.

2, the thinking of Cloning Techniques
Cloning Techniques: Nuclear transfer involves transferring the nucleus from a diploid cell to an unfertilised egg cell from which the maternal nucleus has been removed. The egg and donor cell are normally fused and the 'reconstructed embryo' activated by a short electrical pulse, and allowed to develop into an embryo, and the embryo is then implanted into a surrogate.

We can also use this thinking of cloning techniques on the same-sex reproduction. In this method, two haploid nuclei from two different people are injected into an egg that has had its nucleus removed, and then make them fused three together using some specific method or stimulus in order to develop into an embryo, and the embryo is then implanted into a surrogate. This method is really possible in theory, but so far, we just don’t find a suitable reproductive system to replace an egg and uterus, we still should use a woman as a surrogate. In this whole process, we use the two gametes from two people after meiosis themselves, it means recombination occurs freely and allele exchange freely, the offspring is also have diversity. We just control the fusion of two nucleuses, but not the production of gametes, in order to avoid the trouble with some kinds of trigger stem cell into spermatogonia or oogonia and then force them meiosis.

I know same sex reproduction is a complicated one in terms of political, religious and ethical controversy, but to have descendants keeping parents genes continue to exist in the world should be the common consensus for the human being, whatever straight or gay couples, they do also enjoy the same human rights. Except these artificial resistances, same sex reproduction also has a fatal gender problem. Two female gametes fusion, of course, only can have a baby girl. But what about two male gametes fusion? There are 3 kinds of situations after that. Baby girl is 25 percents, baby boy is 50 percents, and another baby (I don’t know how to call) is 25 percents. What if the YY can survive? Is YY super manly? I don’t know. I think this would be a really interesting subject.

As technology advances, i think it is not difficult for human being to do same sex reproduction. In my opinion, everyone has the right to choose their own way of life, without affecting the others.

 on: January 12, 2012, 06:46:51 AM 
Started by clumsygirl - Last post by clumsygirl
I love the song - God is a girl by Groove Coverage, but I am afraid, from the perspective of human reproduction, God is actually not a girl. The male orgasm has never been difficult to understand in the context of its undeniable role in reproduction. But even now, in the 21st century, we are unable to give a reasonable explanation to the role of female orgasm in human reproduction. There is so little research done on female orgasm, it is like a taboo subject. Apparently, the male orgasm plays a vital biological function in reproduction, but women can conceive whether or not they orgasm. Where does it fit into evolutionary theory? What is the purpose of the female orgasm?

    According to some investigations, lots of women have never experienced orgasm, but a large number of them still become pregnant. Over the last four decades, scientists have come up with a variety of theories, one theory holds that having an orgasm increases a woman’s desire for future sexual encounters which would then lead them to reproduce, and some scientists think that orgasm helped a woman to retain sperm in her uterus by creating a kind of vacuum. This can increase her chances of conception. Some believe that the purpose of the female orgasm is to give her pleasure-period and more scientist think a woman’s orgasm has no evolutionary purpose at all.

    The key to all the problems is people haven't solved the mystery of female orgasm yet. Frankly speaking, I don’t know what is going to happen, after when women know the fact of female orgasm. For many years, the mystery of female orgasm was like Pandora's Box without opened, and it means all women have been deceived as ascetic, but taken the huge responsibility of human reproduction for all time. What are women going to choose, when the Pandora's Box of female orgasm completely open, and they know the pattern of vaginal puncture can never bring an orgasm at all, because the vaginal has no that function. Do women still want to be the Holy Land and continue to fulfill the moral obligations of human reproduction, or courage to say "No" to male orgasm, when they know men and women can never have orgasms together, because of the repulsion of every two orgasm, after every two orgasms, the body must have refractory period. It means only one can orgasm at the same time.

    Now, I start to doubt the Darwin's survival of the fittest and it is really suitable for humans? If one day we really extinct, whether we are not suited to nature any longer and nature select our extinction, or we  say "No" to ourselves. Will the women’s awakening stop human reproduction? I think human reproduction is needed, but not at the expense of women's rights for the price. We should figure out love is love, sex is sex, child is child, marriage is marriage. Maybe one day reproduction also can happen between same-sex, after all it is theoretically feasible.

    I am really a troublemaker. The world is upside down, and only I stay awake, so I am upside down in the eyes of the worlds. I hope the biggest mystery can be opened to the public as soon as possible.

 on: January 01, 2012, 10:29:56 AM 
Started by clumsygirl - Last post by clumsygirl
The more countries developed well, the more they paid attention on women's rights and gender equality, and the more countries underdeveloped, the more gender inequality. Some countries and regions with high degree of democracy and civilization in western, the foundation of these countries is universal values, human rights, democracy and freedom, and females there can have the same basic rights as same as males at least in the Constitution, whatever in political, economic or marriage. They can go out to work and engage in any industry they interested in, some even Prime minister or Secretary of State. Women also can choose marriage or divorce on their own, and some even can legally get into same-sex marriage. Now the world is still a men-dominate, and we need to keep working hard to fight for gender equality.

       However, compared with the Western democracies, there are other two systems, one is a theocracy system commonly in Arab region. These countries are very rich, because the oil, but money is controlled in a few authoritarian monopolies. Women there have low social status, and a man can marry four wives or even more in some areas. Women have no right to work, and no right to choose marriage, even can’t go out without her husband or father accompany. Woman is man's private property, and after her husband's death, his family male members can inherit their property (including his wife). Such this country actually wants to get into the ranks of developed countries, just depending on their single oil exports. I wonder to know urgently what they are going to do after the oil depletion in decades or a century. In my opinion, the only thing they can do is to build extremely luxurious skyscrapers one after another, in order to find the feeling of standing on top of the world. Do not they know that so many developed countries have already abandoned skyscrapers because of safety and cost issues? I only sigh “they are really too rich”. Here I give my best wishes to Libya women, and I hope they are not out of the frying pan, into the fire. After all under Gaddafi's control, Libya reluctantly maintains monogamy, but almost into polygamy after just liberated.

     There is another system mostly in Asia – Single-party states,and some countries are even in family hereditary system. After grandfather death, then father, now son, and grandson in future,they treat the entire country as their private property. What made me angry and annoyed was United Nations General Assembly actually held a few moments of silence for such a dictator who only use lies and violence to rule his nations. Ijust can’t help myself to sigh” how big the woods is in United Nations, what birds are.” Due to the nature of single-party state system, such states have reached a point of irrevocable corruption, and it has been incurable. The whole country all moral turpitude and people laugh for poverty but not for prostitution. As a male, if he wants to survive in this system, he has to move closer to the Single-party and authority, so there are a large number of young people joined the Single-party, but no one really believe in Communism anymore, and the only purpose to join the party is to get a good job or an officer easily, and then has the opportunity to tyrannically abuse his power to bully tragic people than himself. Although monogamy also recognized and permitted in these countries, women there seem have more rights and equality than theocracy women, she can go out to have a work and is free to choose marriage on her own, but this is only superficial, the truth is not that case. The fact is as a vulnerable group of women in this system, she must need to pay more prices, if she wants to survive. Women there are even not qualified to talk about “love”, because in order to survive and live, she must find a man who is beneficial to keep her life better. These countries generally have gender preference seriously and prefer for boys over girls. The reason is simple. First, I have to admit that now the earth still in the patriarchal society, and males have vast majority of primary authority in social organization. In a democratic and civilized country, as a human, females can have a basic life-support as males, but they can’t get them easily in totalitarian state, because of the ubiquitous corruption, women should pay some price to get the basic life-support. Pay what price? You can guess. Bingo! The sex trade.After all survival is the first task than a sense of security, a sense of belonging,dignity or self-realization.

      Many western countries condemned the one-child policy in a country, and they said it was the persecution of human rights. I don’t agree with westerners this time. I can use a diplomatic language to explain “you do not understand our country conditions, you don’t understand people there.” If you want a thorough analysis of this problem, see following sentence.

“The best way to understand behavior is to look at the causes of an action and its consequences.” by B. F. Skinner.

      We should figure out why they build this one-child policy. The reason is easy. They have to, because there are too many people there. We continue to ask deeply why there are many people in their country. That is because female there tend to reproduce more. Go on ask why female there tend to reproduce more. This answer is the key to all problems. You will make a big mistake, if you think the reason that woman get into a marriage in totalitarian states is for love. The Westerners don’t understand that the children are not love crystallization, but just tools that woman can use to control the man, threaten divorce and get best financial decisions, when a society can’t give a sense of security to women. Poor women need children as a bargaining chip to protect themselves. There is the other reason, in order to make them in advantageous position, people need a way to be strengthened in a without independent judiciary country, and of course, nothing is more reliable than the blood. I dare to conclude that the population rapidly reaches 2 billion in a few decades, depending on current national accomplishment, if the government cancels the one-child policy now. Women there have completely despaired of their selves and are totally lost in such a society, and only put all their hopes and energy in their children. “Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother” is the product of desperation.

     Finally, I just want to say all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. Men, think about what if you are a woman next life, you want be treated as inequality?

Here, give my best wishes to all women of the world.

Happy New Year! 2012!


 on: December 23, 2011, 06:07:50 AM 
Started by clumsygirl - Last post by clumsygirl
Recently, I saw some news that 2011 Society for Neuroscience annual meeting in Washington, D.C., Lead author Barry Komisaruk, professor of psychology at Rutgers University, imaged brain activity in several women who were able to masturbate to orgasm in the decidedly unsexy atmosphere of a functional MRI machine. The scientists claim that the only thing that a woman’s orgasm can be compared to, at a brain level, is the epileptic seizure. Not only did they claim this, but they have proven the similarity through a test which consisted in scanning the brain during the actual orgasm. In short, Professor Komisaruk believes he has solved mystery of female orgasm and claims that the female orgasm can be compared to the epileptic seizure.

    I just felt very ridiculous, when I saw this news. I can’t help myself to ask one question to them “why don’t you use MRI to research male orgasm? I don’t know the feasibility of their testing methodology, but I know this conclusion the got have No Value at all. This is just a farce in my eyes like the reality version of the story of emperor’s new clothes. I just want to say all so-called experts are all deceived by fake female orgasm and that female status like epileptic seizure is not real female orgasm at all.

    Why do a group of the world's top scientists believe such a lie? The key point is that women themselves are not clear what the real female orgasm is. They always think that urinary incontinence and some water (urine) gushed from the urethra is real female orgasm. This is a huge mistake. Women have been in pursuit of the so-called mysterious female orgasm for so many years, but until now female orgasm is still in dark. In fact, women and men have the same orgasm pattern and process, and female body also has a system that keeps it from being able to orgasm and urinate at the same time, and female also require time to switch back to urine mode after orgasm mode, and after every orgasm women also have refractory period. I think unless women themselves experience that feeling personally, otherwise they have very difficulty to believe what I said.

    Poor woman is like the same poor emperor in the story of Emperor's New Clothes. They are asked to have orgasm, and asked to be normal. Such a request leads to one result?female totally confused, and they don’t know what the real female orgasm is and what exactly feeling they are supposed to feel. They mistakenly believe the feeling like urinary incontinence by men’s puncture or urine gushed from the urethra is female orgasm, because that feeling during sex puncture is indeed special and really different from other feeling in daily life. The key logic is here, X (a special feeling) is not A (common feeling), but it doesn’t mean X (a special feeling) is B (a real orgasm). I think no one would deny this logic. Woman is like the emperor in the story. The emperor is not sure whether he is wearing clothes or not, but when every body says “How beautifully they fit. What material! What colours! It is a gorgeous suit! ”, the emperor is confused too, and acts like he really has clothes on, and wishes no one can notice he could see nothing and he is not stupid and he is fit to be emperor. In fact, “but he has nothing on!” said a little child at last. Women are also afraid of other people think they are abnormal and not fit for women, before they really figure out what the orgasm is, they could not wait to announce “I can get female orgasm”, and they are indeed addicted to acting more and more like they really have orgasm.

    I think it is not exaggerated to use the story of emperor's new clothes as metaphor to women female orgasm. All people have high expectation to female orgasm, and everyone wants to know how crazy and magical female orgasm. They focus all attention on hypocritical surface of so-called female orgasm, but all ignore the nature of the orgasm, like people ignore the nature role of clothes is keeping "warm". The only purpose of orgasm is to release your body and spirit, and is not concerned about how others look at your orgasm. Women seem must have orgasm, or your husband is not doing well. The main reason women can’t get orgasm is on their own self. Women generally too care about what others say and whether men think they have orgasm, but not orgasm itself. Women only care men’s behavior, and can’t focus all attention to the sex and themselves. I think concentration on self-body is the first thing if women want to learn orgasm.

I hope this farce at Society for Neuroscience annual meeting in Washington, D.C. can stop, please stop grandstanding. I will expose you as the child in the story of Emperor's New Clothes? “but he has nothing on!”.

I like a senior quote by Jane Rizzoli in Rizzoli & Isles TV show in S213.
“Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don’t matter, and those who matter don’t mind.”
Give this sentence to all women of the world, and we encourage each other along.

 on: December 15, 2011, 06:11:01 AM 
Started by clumsygirl - Last post by clumsygirl
Physical satisfaction and emotional satisfaction

      Some sexual experts say the difference between the two genders is that, men need sex for love and women need love for sex. This sentence indeed got the plight women are facing. Many sexual experts try to find the differences between men and women to give a reasonable explanation for sex attitudes. In Non-linear, Basson model clarifies that the goal of sexual activity for women is not necessarily orgasm but rather personal satisfaction, which can manifest as physical satisfaction (orgasm) and/ or emotional satisfaction (a feeling of intimacy and connection with a partner). She proposed two important concepts: physical satisfaction and emotional satisfaction, but she seriously underestimated the natural and important function of physical satisfaction (orgasm) for women, and exaggerated the function of emotional satisfaction for women, and tried to mislead the female physical satisfaction can be replaced by emotional satisfaction. Dr. Basson doesn’t realize that physical satisfaction (orgasm) is also irreplaceable for women as same as men.

      Here, I emphasize the importance of physical satisfaction, but it doesn’t mean I think emotional satisfaction is unimportant. Both concepts are totally different from each other, and the only common thing about these two is that both are feelings for a person. Physical satisfaction purely satisfies one’s physical desires while emotional satisfaction is solely meant to satisfy one’s spiritual.

     Physical satisfaction (orgasm) is a selfish act as it only pleases a person’s physical desire usually associated to man’s sexual demands. In fact, this is not only a man needs, but also a woman needs. The physical desire is an unavoidable natural force which usually related to sexual release. You can get physical satisfaction through touch someone or fantasy for someone in an obscene manner. The last purpose is only an orgasm to release your body, and it is like the function of food for human, and I think you don’t pick the food, when you are hungry and urgent to eat.
Emotional satisfaction (a feeling of intimacy and connection with a partner) is an unselfish act of giving affection to a person. It satisfies a person’s emotional and spiritual needs and commonly used to express an act of unselfishness and affection. I think you must want to have a connection with him/her, if you are in love with someone. There is normal emotional desire.

      Physical satisfaction is simple and emotional satisfaction is complex; physical satisfaction is basic level and emotional satisfaction is high level. That is why men want some affairs with some women they even unknown, though the results they got are same. Human wants get emotional satisfaction after get physical satisfaction easily. It is also like you must want to have a little change for your food, if you have choice. I think so far the woman is not qualified to talk about emotional satisfaction. It doesn’t mean I ignore women's emotions, I just don’t want women confuse the both concepts. I just think the first job for women is figure out what the physical satisfaction, and then talk about emotional satisfaction, or you will live in the story of Emperor's New Clothes forever.

      Love is love, sex is sex. You should love the soul, when you are in love with someone. You just need a hearty orgasm to release yourself, when you have a physical sexual desire.

 on: December 06, 2011, 07:20:31 AM 
Started by clumsygirl - Last post by clumsygirl
Low sex drive in women can be explained by Pavlov’s Classical Conditioning and Skinner’s Operant Conditioning

lots of charts in the paper. sorry i don't know how to post here.


 on: November 20, 2011, 02:58:54 AM 
Started by clumsygirl - Last post by clumsygirl
I build a new female sexual response model, there are 4 figures here, i can't post here. sorry for that.


 on: November 17, 2011, 12:52:44 PM 
Started by lovestory - Last post by lovestory
New post: 11-16-11
The following is a lot more sexually graphic. I would like to describe what usually happens in a love session. It always starts with her giving me oral. Now, you might say that’s pretty standard and it is, but for us it isn’t. She almost always starts with two dozen orgasms just by her giving me oral (no one touches her vagina) so it’s not like I have to ask for it, sometimes it’s three dozen. These aren’t baby orgasms either. On occasion, she will get hemorrhoids they are so strong. At this point my penis is numb so it stays erect for four or more hours after cumming the first time. This isn’t hard to do, because I experience extreme and constant butterflies so I’m constantly turned on to the max and so is she, who wouldn’t be! After oral love making we go in all different directions. The following has happened several times…when we make love for more than four hours her whole body turns beet red from non stop orgasms, by now a hundred or more. I usually have to stop her because I get very worried. So we get into a cold shower to bring her body temp to normal and go back do another hundred. If we hadn’t been the best shape of our lives we never could of done this. This happened after about the second year into our new love making…that’s why we were in shape.
I see a lot of questions on line about female ejaculation. I first experienced it about thirty years ago. Back when no one ever heard of the term. I laid my friend on her dinner table with her legs hanging off. I pulled a chair up and began to have oral sex with her. When she had reached orgasm I noticed something running down her legs. I had no idea what it was then or for years later. I thought she had to go to the bathroom really bad and didn’t
tell me. I apologized and promised her next time we got together I would make sure I was considerate enough to ask if she needed to go first. I’m so embarrassed now! I had “wild thing” thirty years ago and never knew it. She had a very abusive husband that left her because she didn’t like sex and was always dry and couldn’t get an orgasm.
What a fool he was! She was the wettest most orgasmic woman I had ever met up to that point in my life.
Female ejaculation up close and personal…The woman I was with at the time had her first squirt when I was giving her oral sex. It shot all the way to the back of my throat in one huge squirt. I was stunned and couldn’t move, breath or talk. I remember telling myself that I had to remember exactly what it was like…it smelled like concentrated sweat (almost skunk like) the taste is what I’ll never forget. 33%. was very salty, 33% tasted very sour (like dill) and 33% was very acidic. The color was “whitish grey” like dirty dish water. As she continued to squirt with more orgasms it became more clear and finally water like with no taste or smell. She could then squirt at will. Choosing to do it or not. One time driving to Las Vegas at night, she got nude and masturbated in the front seat reaching 64 orgasms and filling up the front floorboard with ejaculate. Any time we would drive more than an hour she would do this even in the day time. I loved it!
Anal sex…been with a few girls that liked it. Mostly it’s an “in the moment” kind of a thing. Can women get anal orgasms…yes. However, we opted not to do it that often simply because we were always doing all kinds of other positions and once you do anal the female can get a very easy vaginal infection. Besides, if a woman can do multiple orgasms her vaginal muscles become so tight that while aroused it becomes tighter than the anus. So, what would be the point?
I found two other places on a female that if stimulated, in the right frame of mind, can orgasm.
Can a woman have an orgasm through stimulating her breasts…yes!
Can a woman have an orgasm through phone sex…yes, multiple
Can a woman have an orgasm without touching herself…yes, multiple!
I can honestly say that I have had the absolute best sex of anyone on the planet!
I’m not bragging… I’m rejoicing!

 on: November 07, 2011, 07:14:23 AM 
Started by clumsygirl - Last post by clumsygirl
Porn can not be banned forever, because the fantasies are really helped for everyone.

A lot of my female colleagues around me are very curious why their husbands like to watch porn so much, and these women really can’t figure out how fun it is. When I told them I also like to watch porn, they all got big surprise and give me a strange look like I am a freaky girl. That scene made me very embarrassed, because I don’t know what I can explain and how I can explain. I only can keep silent.

    I think this question not only plagued my female colleagues around me, but also all women around the world. They think watching naked flesh makes them some kind of queasy, and they all advocate porn should be banned from the internet.

    I don’t think so. I think porn can not be banned forever, because the fantasies are really helped for everyone. I believe that every adult man has seen porn and often saw, whether Presidents, Prime Ministers, or Civilian. Maybe they don’t love to see it, but they need to see it. That is the human nature. In my view watching porn is a highly cost-effective thing, when you want to orgasm and release yourself. Orgasm is not simple physiological functions like eat, drink or something, it contains complex nerve conduction. First, subjectively you need an orgasm to release yourself. Second, in order to complete orgasm, you need to find an objective to arouse your sexual organs. Porn is useful now. You can use visual stimulation to let you have physiological responses. This is the most direct and highly cost-effective way. Finally, when you are ready, you can masturbate or find someone to orgasm.

    Why don’t women understand men like to see porn? Only one reason: women can’t get orgasm at all. I know there are many women out against what I said, but unfortunately I am right. Give you a very simple example: Woman's status is as same as the French wine in China. You know why the French wine are almost all counterfeit in China? Two reasons: First, also most important reason, Chinese people never never have drink real French wine, of course they can’t distinguish between genuine or counterfeit. Second, face is a concept of central importance because of its pervasive influence in interpersonal relations among Chinese, and the drinking French wine attach too much importance to 'face', people don’t want to expose it, if when they find some thing wrong with the French wine they drink. These two reasons are also applied to women for the female orgasm. Women don’t have an idea about female orgasm, they don’t even know what the female orgasm is, how to get orgasm. When I watch the porn, my attention is very focused, because I know I need some changes in myself. After a while, I can feel I am wet, of course it is not a necessary condition, but important thing I can feel my nerves jumping in my clitoral shaft, that feeling is very strong and with heart resonance sometimes. That is my physiological responses, I can’t help it. Then I am ready to orgasm I know that. I only have to waste about 1 minute to squeeze my clitoral shaft to get about 10 seconds shudder of climax. That is it.

    Porn will never disappear, people really need it. Some countries under the cover name of anti-pornography have strict controls on the internet and establish the Great Firewall, and they have only one purpose: maintain their tyranny and dictatorship. It is time to wake up.

 on: November 03, 2011, 11:56:20 AM 
Started by clumsygirl - Last post by clumsygirl
sorry, there are some pictures, i can't post them here.

Unlocking the mystery of female orgasm will be the last straw that broke the same-sex marriage illegal.


Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.15 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!